Looking for something?

Loading...

Sunday, 3 February 2013

The Politics of Tongue Tie




I have often been critical of doctors and midwives on this blog - for not listening to mothers and for their lack of breastfeeding knowledge. I guess they might be forgiven for the latter though, since as yet most doctors and some midwives have received little to no breastfeeding education during their training. Because of this I've always urged mothers to make contact with International Board Certified Lactation Consultants (IBCLC's) when they need support with a more involved breastfeeding problem since they really are the 'Gold Standard' in breastfeeding support.

It's far from easy to become a lactation consultant - it takes years of hard work and literally hundreds of hours spent in lactation support. You have to re-certify every few years and the IBCLC qualification is well respected by mothers and professionals alike.

So I have to ask (as the mother of two children with posterior tongue ties and lip ties - finally diagnosed): why was I personally told by three different lactation consultants that posterior tongue ties 'don't exist'? Or that they are 'just the current *in-thing* like thrush was a few years back'? That they 'don't affect breastfeeding' and could not be the cause of my children's problems? Why when I followed up one discussion with supporting information via email did I not even receive the courtesy of a reply? Am I so arrogant to imagine that I, (*just* a mum) might be on the right track about something concerning my child's health? 

Why was I accused by one IBCLC of coming on too strong with a friend who very much wanted to breastfeed when I drove her an hour in one direction to see the IBCLC, then an hour in the other direction to get her a double breast pump (which saved her supply because her baby couldn't latch)? Was it because that LC had little more to offer that day than directions to the nearest Tesco so my friend could get her baby some formula? Following this encounter my friend contacted Charlie at Milk Matters and took her baby across to England where he had his posterior tongue tie revised. He went on to breastfeed for a year. Another mum (friend of a friend) who had rung me in tears* had had her baby's tongue tie spotted by the midwives in the hospital but had been told that it wasn't affecting breastfeeding. This mum had mastitis and cracked nipples by day 5 and her baby was unable to attach effectively to the breast, but clearly that MUSTN'T be anything to do with the tongue tie... These are just two examples, but I could go on!

After all [paraphrasing now]: 'Why would we SUDDENLY be seeing all these issues connected with tongue tie?' Since estimates of tongue tie frequency range from just 4% to 10% 'Isn't it a bit odd that SUDDENLY all these mums are asking if their babies have tongue tie'?'

Did none of these nay-sayers stop to wonder if it's perhaps as simple as more breastfeeding mums becoming alerted to the symptoms and asking for help (thanks largely to the internet)? How many more mothers are turning to formula feeding when their child's tie goes undiagnosed? How many tongue ties are being completely missed and instead the child ends up on medication (eg. for reflux as my eldest did) or perhaps develops speech problems further down the line and loses confidence as a result? 

On my own journey through the 'Tongue Tie Maze' I had personal contact with three IBCLC's who found it easier to tell me I was wrong (and they probably said worse behind my back!) than to give thought to the possible effects on the developing fetus of nutrition prior to and during pregnancy; supplementation in pregnancy; epigenetics; increasing levels of environmental toxins; fortified foods; increased use of antibiotics; poor maternal gut health; increasing exposure to vaccinations; or genetic mutations like MTHFR.

Because let's face it, none of that's in the LITERATURE (yet), and on that basis it can't possibly be affecting us, right? *eye roll*

I came away from those conversations feeling stupid. Like I had over-stepped my boundaries to be asking such inane questions. Naughty girl.

In the case of those three lactation consultants who dismissed me on posterior tongue tie, I could easily accuse them of doing what I often accuse medical professionals of doing - of not listening to mothers. As some of you will probably know, it's very easy to find yourself dismissed by professionals because you 'read something on the internet'. There is a saying that 'a worried mother will do better research than the FBI', and I think there is probably a grain of truth in that. I suspect that most of the IBCLC's who now specialise in tongue-tie do so because they have had to deal with it on a personal level, and likewise most of those who dismiss tongue-tie as a non-issue have not.

There is (happily) a growing number of dedicated IBCLC's working very hard to learn more about tongue tie (and lip tie). The only trouble is, even these experts cannot agree on how best to advise mothers.

You might not realise it but when you see an IBCLC who specialises in tongue tie that person might be giving you different advice to a fellow IBCLC who ALSO specialises in tongue tie. The same goes for some of the dentists and paediatricians who revise tongue and lip ties. They are all (clearly) doing their best but unfortunately the animosity and at times downright unprofessional behaviour which surrounds the tongue tie issue is quite something to behold. Stretching versus not-stretching; CST/ Osteopathy/ Chiropractic versus no bodywork and so on. And woe betide you if you get stuck in the middle of one of those nasty (and at times for me personally upsetting) cat-fights. How on earth is a mum to know what to do for the best when the professionals cannot agree? 

So what's to be done? Well, surely it's not unreasonable to ensure that every IBCLC has at least HEARD of the different types of tongue tie? That they can identify one and refer on if necessary, and have the ability to support effectively a mother whose baby is tied in some way? Is it ok that some IBCLC's have not got this knowledge? I don't think so. I would also love it if some of those who undertake lactation support would remember why they went into it in the first place - which was presumably to support mothers to breastfeed... If mums like me and my friends are being dismissed by some Certified Lactation Consultants and (importantly) are not being 'heard', then where is there left for us to turn? Is this something the ILCA needs to address? Well, in my opinion yes. I'm just throwing it out there...

More (some!) proper research is needed into how to lay the groundwork for revision, and into the best way to provide aftercare in a manner which is both effective and appropriate. Anecdotal evidence suggests that these issues are not as clear cut (pardon the pun) as some would have you believe, and until more is known it is my opinion that mothers should be told this. Those who support mothers with tied babies should be keeping good records, following-up on their procedures and sharing their information with each other in a spirit of co-operation instead of arguing over the internet about who is right or wrong.

It would also be good if more questions were asked with an open mind - for example: IS tongue tie more common these days? If so, shouldn't we be concerned that something is changing in our children? After all - tongue tie doesn't JUST affect breastfeeding - it affects the way the inside of the infant's mouth develops, the way their teeth are positioned, the very shape of their face, the way their nasal passages develop, the way they breathe, the way they digest their food and thus how much benefit they get from it. Because of this, I would suggest that dismissing mothers who are concerned about tongue tie is a very bad idea indeed.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

On a personal note: 

I want to thank Charlotte from Milk Matters, John Roberts at Cote Royd Dental, Ann DobsonTracy from Huddersfield Osteopaths and Marie at CranioSacral Ireland for their professionalism, kindness, their willingness to hear me, and especially for the gentle and loving way in which they have each cared for my children. 

I also must gratefully acknowledge Jennifer Tow for her advice on gut healing and her help towards finally obtaining a diagnosis for my girls.

We ended up travelling from Northern Ireland to England to have my youngest revised. There is absolutely no-one in the North of Ireland who revises posterior ties (even anterior is a struggle in some areas!). I am not aware of anyone who revises children older than 12 months in Ireland. We used our savings to pay for my youngest to be revised - for many people this wouldn't even be an option. Do I think mothers and babies deserve better? Hell yes! Will I get criticised for writing this blog? Oh probably - but it's been a long time coming.

*Just in case it's not completely obvious, I've never been paid for helping anyone with breastfeeding - rather the reverse - being a breastfeeding peer supporter has cost me both time and petrol. 

Further reading: 

http://theresearchingcrunchymama.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/mthfr-and-our-journey-with-lip.html
http://www.brianpalmerdds.com/frenum.htm
http://guidance.nice.org.uk/IPG149
http://www.analyticalarmadillo.co.uk/2011/04/tongue-tie-hidden-cause-of-feeding.html

Read more about the 'Tongue Tie Maze' and other mother's stories here:  http://maddiemcmahon.com/2011/05/11/the-kindest-cut-the-emotional-impact-of-the-tongue-tie-maze/

19 comments:

  1. This is one awesome blog post!! I am in California, America, and though I have not personally seen the kind of in-fighting you describe, I have seen tongue-tie be overlooked, ignored, and not treated. I tend to be able to catch tongue-tie when others have missed it. Once on a 13 y.o. it was missed by 2 very competent IBCLCs who I really respect. Then when I brought it to the attention of the doc, it was dismissed as unimportant and not treated. We see a lot of that here. There are so few docs who are willing to see it as a problem and to treat it. so, diagnosis is only part of our problem. Once diagnosed, it takes a grand effort to get someone
    to do something about it. Thank-you for this post. I will share it far and wide.

    ReplyDelete
  2. As an IBCLC myself this post really hits the mark! I hear this ALL THE TIME sadly. I trained with Jack Newman and got an incredible education in assessing all kinds of tongue ties and yes, I experience all of the above through the parents I help - whether they get it from a doctor, midwife or fellow LC. I really feel for parents because at the end of the day with so much conflicting information out there, who should they believe!! I pass on all the information I have and then help them facilitate appointments with pediatricians I know who do recognise and treat all kinds of TT's. I think the most important thing that struck me about your post was that the poor families end up in the middle of these conflicts! This is totally unprofessional and not what they need at that time. We all as professionals need to take that comment very much to heart in our practice!!

    Thank you for this post!

    ReplyDelete
  3. On the flip side as an IBCLC aware of it and trying to get treatment there is often a lot of resistance from parents also.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I am one of the IBCLC's who recognize tie and refer for revision, BUT most moms are told that there is nothing to fix. Over and over and over. Thanks for the great post. Best of luck.
    Rowena Tucker IBCLC
    rtpalc@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  5. I read a great blog post on this last week about the growing underground movement in treating tongue tie in Ireland: http://mindthebaby.wordpress.com/2013/01/25/why-is-treating-tongue-tie-in-breastfed-babies-an-underground-movement-in-ireland/

    Well worth a read.

    ReplyDelete
  6. @Lisa - unfortunately the 'underground movement' hasn't even reached the North - where I live. And, as I said in the post, it's impossible to get a child of the age my youngest is now revised anywhere on the island yet. The powers-that-be in the North just are not listening to mothers. Both in the NHS system, and outside of it. @Kim - thanks for your comment. I think that where there is reluctance from parents it may have several causes. Amongst them, fear and unease about aspects of some provider's aftercare recommendations, and of course - cost. In addition, I think that many parents believe that if Mr X or Ms Y says there isn't an issue then there is no need to revise. We live in a culture in which if the MD/ GP/ IBCLC doesn't know about it, then we assume it mustn't exist and doubt ourselves - even when the problems are clear to see. x anne

    ReplyDelete
  7. Isn't Dr Roberts lovely, and Jennifer Tow is a wonderful mine of information. My local IBCLC is in the know of ties and revises tongue ties, she has urged me to write of my experiences in our journey with upper lip tie and posterior tongue tie, help get the message out there. Thank you for this blog post :)

    ReplyDelete
  8. The Hazelbaker Assessment Tool for Lingual Frenulum Function is a "Must-Know" for IBCLCs. Both the appearance and function of the tongue are assessed and give a score which can be very predictive for TT and breastfeeding problems.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I agree that more information needs to be taken in by all the people who are around babies. Tongue and lip tie can impact breastfeeding. An ENT called me about the baby I said probably had PTT and LT. He said the baby had a LT but they never do anything til the child is 8 years old. They they use general anesthesia and stitches. In his opinion there was no tongue tie and lip tie doesn't affect breastfeeding. EEEK! Sylvia Boyd, IBCLC, PT in Hayward, CA

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dr. James Jesse in Southern California, San Bernardino is a dentist who specializes in fixing tongue and lip ties with laser...he is awesome..many moms travel far to see him

      Delete
  10. I re-read your blog today, and had a few thoughts.

    One point you made which I think is CRUCIAL is what you said about practitioners who revise TT needing to keep good records. The medical establishment won't start paying attention to TT until there is a good evidence base for TT - clear definitions of the types of TT, and robust outcomes from revision, such as whether there is improved feeding, whether gastric symptoms are resolved etc; as well as bleeding, infection and other complications that have arisen from the revision, and outcomes from different techniques used for revision. I did a literature search recently and out of the 350 articles on TT that came up on the databases (CIHAHL and Medline), only TWO mentioned posterior tongue tie. Neither of these are what would be consider "high level" evidence. No wonder the medical profession (and midwives, IBCLC's) haven't heard of it or do not think it is important. If the profile of TT is to be raised in these circles then we need to insist on rigorous audit and large studies - these are the only evidence that will convince medics etc of the existence of TT and the importance of revision. Quite frankly, we need to play them at their own game; they won't be convinced by anectodal evidence so we need to insist on evidence that DOES convince them.

    In terms of politics, there is another issue. Quite often developments in medicine or changes in the health service are driven by political or financial concerns. One example: the recent support of homebirth and birth in midwifery led units for low risk women, now supported officially by the RCOG and part of maternity strategies throughout the UK. Is this because all of a sudden the NHS supports normality in childbirth? Perhaps, but it is much CHEAPER in the long run for low risk women to give birth outside of obstetric units, which is probably the real driving force behind these changes. What incentive is there for medical staff to sit up and take notice of breastfeeding problems caused by TT? None. As someone commented to me recently, "Health care professionals pay lip service to breastfeeding, but when there are problems, the solution that is given is to switch to formula and bottles". The truth is, when it comes to TT there is no financial incentive to develop a service for revision, no pharmaceutical company to sponsor or invest in research, no incentive to find a solution so mums can continue to breastfeed. Much easier to go for the easy solution -the TT isn't "serious" enough to do anything about, or perhaps even deny that there is a TT altogether. Never mind that revising the TT might result in longer, sustained breastfeeding with the immeasurable health benefits that this will have for that child's health in the long term, the reduction in discomfort for both mother and baby, or the improved mothering experience - these benefits (which are SO important to us as mothers) just aren't important in the health service. Sadly, while it is merely an important issue for mothers, and not for health care professionals, I'm not sure whether TT will become high profile.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @Rebecca Scott-Pillai - but there is financial incentive in increasing breastfeeding rates and therefore investing in revising tongue tie. UNICEF UK published an utterly convincing report last November on how even slight increases in breastfeeding rates across the UK could save the NHS millions: http://www.unicef.org.uk/Latest/News/breastfeeding-report-nhs-savings/
      They erred on the side of conservatism with their estimates which in my mind only furthers their case. It's fairly hard to dispute.

      Delete
  11. Very interesting post. I live in Germany, where bf is very common (at least at birth and until 6 months), but -paradoxically- tongue tie completely ignored.. My son had a -very very- tied tongue, which turned our bf into nightmare for the first 6 weeks (I almost gave up at 2 weeks), when I finally decided to step up and insist on having a frenulotomy for him in France. His anterior tie took 2 seconds to release, the effect to my breasts was immediate and the bf improved greatly in the next weeks.
    He still has a somehow sneaky posterior tongue tie, which the doctor who did the anterior frenulotomy would only release under general anesthesia. I'm wondering whether it's worth putting him through such a surgery...
    I myself am in almost the same situation : anterior tongue tie discovered at 6 weeks -which meant the end of bf for me at only few days old- and posterior tongue tie that I still have. Except for the "r" that I cannot pronounce correctly, I don't reckon any other effects on me. But I will never be able to compare with what it would have been if I had a normal tongue..
    For my son I'm still waiting, thinking about it and trying to find a doctor who is really experienced in sneaky tongue ties -which will be the most difficult part I think. For now he digests normally, I'm wondering what other effects his posterior tongue tie might have on him ? And would they be so serious that it becomes worth having him have this scary surgery under general anesthesia ? ...

    ReplyDelete
  12. Thank you! I want to add that the politics inside the world of TT/LT is such that it is actually stopping people who've been working on this from practicing. The stress level for those trying to navigate this is enough to make some of us quit.

    ReplyDelete
  13. As an IBCLC practicing in the Republic of Ireland I can so relate to your frustrations, this is indeed a problem and mothers are having to travel long distrances to get a diagnoses from the 'right' IBCLC. I can so relate to your comment that it is IBCLC's who have personal experience with all the full range of tt who have gone on journeys to help solve this for other mothers. Mine started 24 years ago and I am still trying to make things better for Mums than it was for me. But your right we need acknowledgement of the existence of tongue tie on this island and maybe then we will see change.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I am blessed in that the local IBCLC knew about tongue tie and gave a referral to a good doctor. I first went to a different doctor because of insurance not covering he other one. That one, though, was dismissive of my concerns and wouldn't acknowledge that posterior ties exist, or that it would affect my child. He actually blamed my low supply as the cause of everything, when tht was caused by the TT. Thankfully the doctor the IBCLC recommended worked out a payment plan with me and immediately spotted and revised the TT. It looks like the AAP only started recognizing posterior ties fairly recently, like in the last 5ish years.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I knew very little about TT until I trained as a peer supporter. I've learned to recognize anterior TT (when mums pull the tongue around) but I've never been able to get my head around posterior TT. I've looked at pictures, read articles and frankly I just couldn't see it, until I realised that I was comparing everything to my mouth which I took to be 'normal'. It finally hit me like a bomb that in fact I have a posterior TT and so do my girls! And frankly it all fits, the trouble I had with my girls and the trouble my mum had we me (and she nearly didn't BF me at all) can be directly attributed to posterior TT! Thank you Granny for spending so much time with my mum to get her started feeding me and thank you Mum for passing that on to me, I hope I honour you with the Peer Support I do. Paying it forward.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I'm in Australia and was recently advised by doctors, midwives and lactation consultants to supplementary feed ("You have to use formula or she'll die.") when my newborn daughter dropped 16% of her birth weight. Her latch was checked and pronounced fine and I was producing fore milk so she never dehydrated. I was told it was a supply issue and put on Mottilium (to trigger more milk). I researched lactation cookies and took fenugreek. And for two weeks gave her a full day's supply of formula in addition to hours on the breast, trying to trigger my hind milk. Nothing worked and I was told to switch to formula. Frustrated, I searched online for a reason and found descriptions and images of babies with lip ties. Sure enough, my daughter had this. I asked and was told by three people that it didn't have an impact on nursing. I adjusted by nursing hold and monitored my daughter for lip curling (as advised online) and in two days I had hind milk... It turns out that both my so and myself have this too - he dropped a lot of weight after birth and it took weeks to establish bf although he went on to nurse for years.My mother was told that her milk didn't come in and that she had to use formula. More education and support for lip/ tongue ties is essential!

    ReplyDelete
  17. Tongue Tie Babies Support Group on Facebook helped me alot...they have moms from all over the world on there, and references to dionysus and ENT docs.....also, wwe.kiddsteeth.com had info on types of ties and pictures as well

    ReplyDelete

I LOVE to hear from you, so please leave any comments or feedback below. Just a polite reminder though - if you're rude or abusive your comment will be deleted.